<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>akjv.org &#187; DOCTRINE OF WESTCOTT AND HORT.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.akjv.org/tag/doctrine-of-westcott-and-hort/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.akjv.org</link>
	<description>King James Version , The Correct Holy Bible</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:45:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DOCTRINE OF WESTCOTT AND HORT.</title>
		<link>http://www.akjv.org/doctrine-of-westcott-and-hort.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.akjv.org/doctrine-of-westcott-and-hort.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOCTRINE OF WESTCOTT AND HORT.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akjv.org/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE DOCTRINE OF WESTCOTT AND HORT. The Scripture It is clear that neither Westcott nor Hort held anything even faintly resembling a conservative view of Scripture. According to Hort’s son, Dr. Hort’s own mother (a devout Bible believer) could not be sympathetic to his views about the Bible. Westcott wrote to Hort that he overwhelmingly rejected the "idea of the infallibility of the Bible". Hort says the same thing, the same week, in a letter to Bishop Lightfoot. When Westcott became the Bishop of Durham, the Durham University Journal welcomed him with the praise that he was "free from all verbal or mechanical ideas of inspiration". Salvation Hort called the doctrine of the substitutionary atonement "immoral". In doing so he sided with the normal doctrine of the High Church Party of the Church of England. The Low Church Party was generally evangelical, teaching salvation through personal faith in Jesus Christ. The High Church Party taught salvation by good works, including baptism and church membership. Westcott and Hort wrote many commentaries that include references to classic passages about salvation. Repeatedly their commentary is vague and unclear.and unclear. Westcott taught that the idea of "propitiating God" was "foreign to the..New Testament". He [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.akjv.org/doctrine-of-westcott-and-hort.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

