<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>akjv.org &#187; bible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.akjv.org/bible/bible/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.akjv.org</link>
	<description>King James Version , The Correct Holy Bible</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:45:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bibles for sale</title>
		<link>http://www.akjv.org/bibles-for-sale.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.akjv.org/bibles-for-sale.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akjv.org/?p=293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All these are listing from ebay.I have organized this for you to return KJV results,however you can use the search function for any item you want. Search for: These are items recently veiwed or purchased on our site: KJV Holy Bible Gift Award Imitation Leather PINK,&#32;1989 KJV BURGUNDY GENUINE BONDED LEATHER HOLY BIBLE W DEUTEROCANONICAL BOOKS,&#32;POCKET SIZE New Testament Holy Bible KJV NEW,&#32;KJV Pew Bible 1991 Hardcover New Prussian Blue,&#32;KJV Pew Bible 1991 Hardcover New Scarlet Red,&#32;KJV OLD SCOFIELD STUDY BIBLE BLACK GENUINE LEATHER NEW,&#32;KJV PERSONAL REFERENCE BIBLE BLACK BONDED LEATHER NEW,&#32;KJV POCKET BIBLE BURGUNDY BONDED LEATHER SNAP FLAP NEW,&#32;KJV GIANT PRINT CORNERSTONE REFERENCE BIBLE BLACK THUMB INDEXED BRAND NEW,&#32;KJV LARGE PRINT COMPACT REFERENCE BIBLE FLEXISOFT BERRY BRAND NEW,&#32;KJV CAMBRIDGE POCKET REFERENCE BIBLE GRAY NEW,&#32;KJV ZONDERVAN PERSONAL GIANT PRINT BIBLE BLACK LEATHER BRAND NEW,&#32;KJV CAMBRIDGE CAMEO BIBLE WITH APOCRYPHA BLACK CALFSKIN LEATHER BRAND NEW,&#32;KJV ZONDERVAN PERSONAL GIANT PRINT BIBLE BLUE LEATHER BRAND NEW,&#32;KJV THOMPSON CHAIN REFERENCE BIBLE BONDED LEATHER BLACK BRAND NEW,&#32;NEW Companion Bible KJV Bullinger Ethelbert W,&#32;NEW Thompson Chain Reference Bible KJV Large Print,&#32;NEW Thompson Chain Reference Bible KJV Handy Size,&#32;BIB 475 KJV NIV Holy Bible w Holman Franklin Electronic,&#32;509 S KJV THOMP CHAIN REF BIBLE BURGUNDY BONDED LEATH [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.akjv.org/bibles-for-sale.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jerusalem Blade&#8217;s PB Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.akjv.org/jerusalem-blades-pb-blog.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.akjv.org/jerusalem-blades-pb-blog.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akjv.org/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[another post from this Brother who just mighjt ride a white horse and blow a bugle(humor) Responding to James White of AOMIN I’ve decided to – as briefly as possible – come out of retirement from being highly active on Puritanboard so as to respond to James White’s “invitation” on the AOMIN blog, and also to things he said on the DL while talking with Rob Wieland. Due to my need to give adequate time preparing a series of sermons on Revelation, and whatever is left after tending to the church, and being a good husband to my wife (not in order of importance!), devoting the remainder to the book I’m working on, A Great and Terrible Love, I have to carefully set my time-management priorities (an update on the book will be on the blog here shortly). This response will be in one single post – I’m afraid to say – as separate continuous posts are no longer supported here at PB. Sections that would have been separate posts will be divided by red dots. Dear Doctor White, (Allow me, please, to call you James, Dr. White) I know your invitation pertained to callers on the DL, but as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.akjv.org/jerusalem-blades-pb-blog.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do KJ Only types believe the Westcott and Hort manuscripts are bad?</title>
		<link>http://www.akjv.org/why-do-kj-only-types-believe-the-westcott-and-hort-manuscripts-are-bad.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.akjv.org/why-do-kj-only-types-believe-the-westcott-and-hort-manuscripts-are-bad.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akjv.org/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Critical text (the Westcott &#038; Hort manuscripts) there is the omission of “God” in 1 Timothy 3:16. Let’s look more closely at that text. Burgon, responding to the margin note in the original 1881 Revision which says “The word God, in place of He who, rests on no sufficient ancient evidence”, replies (we quote from the summation of his 76-page dissertation of proofs to the contrary): Behold then the provision which THE AUTHOR of Scripture has made for the effectual conservation in its integrity of this portion of His written Word! Upwards of eighteen hundred years have run their course since the HOLY GHOST by His servant, Paul, rehearsed the ‘mystery of Godliness;’ declaring this to be the great foundation-fact,—namely, that ‘GOD WAS MANIFESTED IN THE FLESH.’ And lo, out of two hundred and fifty-four [cursive] copies of S. Paul’s Epistles no less than two hundred and fifty-two are discovered to have preserved that expression. Such ‘Consent’ amounts to Unanimity; and, (as I explained at pp. 454-5,) unanimity in this subject matter, is conclusive. The copies of which we speak, (you are requested to observe,) were produced in every part of ancient Christendom,—being derived in every instance from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.akjv.org/why-do-kj-only-types-believe-the-westcott-and-hort-manuscripts-are-bad.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>what does the number 10-mean in scripture</title>
		<link>http://www.akjv.org/what-does-the-number-10-mean-in-scripture.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.akjv.org/what-does-the-number-10-mean-in-scripture.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akjv.org/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10 = completion The number ten is the start of a whole new order of numbers and the culmination of the numbers that come before it. This may seem to be merely a distinction given to ten under our decimal numbering system. However the numbering systems in use in the time that the Bible was written were also based upon the number ten. A look at the number values assigned to the Hebrew and Greek letters in the table shown in the introduction Hebrew and Greek numerics will show that the letters were given values from one to ten, then increasing in tens to 100 then increasing by 100's and so on. Furthermore numbering by tens is built in to our very anatomy, count up on your fingers and when they are all used, make a mark on a piece of paper and start from your first finger again. One of the best books on the market about numbers in the KJV Bible bullinger Number in Scripture (SEE BELOW) Soon you will have a number of marks, each representing 'two hands' worth. Thus in ancient times as in modern times ten is the start of a whole new order of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.akjv.org/what-does-the-number-10-mean-in-scripture.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homo sapiens?</title>
		<link>http://www.akjv.org/homo-sapiens.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.akjv.org/homo-sapiens.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akjv.org/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Author: a Christian There have been many findings demonstrating that Homo sapiens dates back even earlier than 800,000 years. One of them is a discovery by Louis Leakey in the early 1970s in Olduvai Gorge. Here, in the Bed II layer, Leakey discovered that Australopithecus, Homo habilis and Homo erectus species had co-existed at the same time. What is even more interesting was a structure Leakey found in the same layer (Bed II). Here, he found the remains of a stone hut. The unusual aspect of the event was that this construction, which is still used in some parts of Africa, could only have been built by Homo sapiens! So, according to Leakey's findings, Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus and modern man must have co-existed approximately 1.7 million years ago.219 This discovery must surely invalidate the evolutionary theory that claims that modern man evolved from ape-like species such as Australopithecus. Indeed, some other discoveries trace the origins of modern man back to 1.7 million years ago. One of these important finds is the footprints found in Laetoli, Tanzania, by Mary Leakey in 1977. These footprints were found in a layer that was calculated to be 3.6 million years old, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.akjv.org/homo-sapiens.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>a broken sword ?</title>
		<link>http://www.akjv.org/a-broken-sword.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.akjv.org/a-broken-sword.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akjv.org/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More Truths of the KJV A broken sword does little if any good for the solider (the word is sharper that any two edge sword..) - Is the KJV full of errors and mistakes? - Has God ask us to live our life by His word,by His example, then given us a book that is faulty and erroneous ? (James1:21-23 we are told to be "doers of the     word",Psalm 12:6-7 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.) Who says what is true and which words and verses belongs in the Word of God ? Man has something inside of him that makes us to think we are some how capable of judging rightly what is or is not The Word of God (perhaps the garden is a good place to start looking at this). I personally think that something inside is sin. We like our God to be in a box so we can use Him when we feel like it and when we don't want to deal with Him we just place [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.akjv.org/a-broken-sword.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Development of the Biblial Canon</title>
		<link>http://www.akjv.org/development-of-the-biblial-canon.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.akjv.org/development-of-the-biblial-canon.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development of the Biblial Canon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akjv.org/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1000-50 BC: The Old Testament (hereafter "OT") books are written. C. 200 BC: Rabbis translate the OT from Hebrew to Greek, a translation called the "Septuagint" (abbreviation: "LXX"). The LXX ultimately includes 46 books. AD 30-100: Christians use the LXX as their scriptures. This upsets the Jews. C. AD 100: So Jewish rabbis meet at the Council of Jamniah and decide to include in their canon only 39 books, since only these can be found in Hebrew. C. AD 400: Jerome translates the Bible from Hebrew and Greek into Latin (called the "Vulgate"). He knows that the Jews have only 39 books, and he wants to limit the OT to these; the 7 he would leave out (Tobit, Judith, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach [or "Ecclesiasticus"], and Baruch--he calls "apocrypha," that is, "hidden books." But Pope Damasus wants all 46 traditionally-used books included in the OT, so the Vulgate has 46. AD 1536: Luther translates the Bible from Hebrew and Greek to German. He assumes that, since Jews wrote the Old Testament, theirs is the correct canon; he puts the extra 7 books in an appendix that he calls the "Apocrypha." AD 1546: The Catholic Council of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.akjv.org/development-of-the-biblial-canon.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOCTRINE OF WESTCOTT AND HORT.</title>
		<link>http://www.akjv.org/doctrine-of-westcott-and-hort.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.akjv.org/doctrine-of-westcott-and-hort.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOCTRINE OF WESTCOTT AND HORT.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akjv.org/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE DOCTRINE OF WESTCOTT AND HORT. The Scripture It is clear that neither Westcott nor Hort held anything even faintly resembling a conservative view of Scripture. According to Hort’s son, Dr. Hort’s own mother (a devout Bible believer) could not be sympathetic to his views about the Bible. Westcott wrote to Hort that he overwhelmingly rejected the "idea of the infallibility of the Bible". Hort says the same thing, the same week, in a letter to Bishop Lightfoot. When Westcott became the Bishop of Durham, the Durham University Journal welcomed him with the praise that he was "free from all verbal or mechanical ideas of inspiration". Salvation Hort called the doctrine of the substitutionary atonement "immoral". In doing so he sided with the normal doctrine of the High Church Party of the Church of England. The Low Church Party was generally evangelical, teaching salvation through personal faith in Jesus Christ. The High Church Party taught salvation by good works, including baptism and church membership. Westcott and Hort wrote many commentaries that include references to classic passages about salvation. Repeatedly their commentary is vague and unclear.and unclear. Westcott taught that the idea of "propitiating God" was "foreign to the..New Testament". He [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.akjv.org/doctrine-of-westcott-and-hort.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westcott and Hort Blunders</title>
		<link>http://www.akjv.org/westcott-and-hort-westcott-and-hort-blunders.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.akjv.org/westcott-and-hort-westcott-and-hort-blunders.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westcott and Hort Blunderses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akjv.org/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would you take a magic marker to your Bible and cross out words from passages? This chart illustrates what was done when the text used by Christianity for 1800 years was replaced with a text assembled by Westcott and Hort in the nineteenth century and used as the basis for the English Revised Version, which nearly all modern translations closely follow. The text shown here is the King James Version. Words, sentences, or entire verses in strikethrough illustrate portions that have been removed from the text underlying the KJV New Testament. Not all modern versions are the same. Sometimes the NASB will include a word the NIV doesn't, or the NRSV might omit a phrase the NIV and NASB both retain, etc... but for the most part, the examples below represent nearly all of the popular modern versions. (Psudeo-KJV versions such as the NKJV are far more subtle and are a different case. See the articles section for NKJV examinations.) Westcott and Hort's magic marker]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.akjv.org/westcott-and-hort-westcott-and-hort-blunders.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In What Order Should I Study the Bible?</title>
		<link>http://www.akjv.org/in-what-order-should-i-study-the-bible.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.akjv.org/in-what-order-should-i-study-the-bible.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order of the books of the Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.akjv.org/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have started to read the Bible, you have begun a great thing. Unfortunately, it is easy to get frustrated or defeated while reading the Bible if you don't know where to get started. Logically, the beginning seems like the right place to start, but that would be a mistake. Today I will show you a plan to read and understand the Bible. If you think it is arbitrary in the beginning, keep on reading. I have found a plan to help you understand what you read, making sense of the flow and thought of the Bible as you read.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.akjv.org/in-what-order-should-i-study-the-bible.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

